
The recent reorganization of the Health and Human Services Department under the Trump administration has resulted in the dismissal of key health officials responsible for overseeing care for vulnerable populations, specifically over 500,000 children and more than 600,000 pregnant women with H.I.V. in low-income countries.
These expert teams, which managed programs aimed at preventing mother-to-child transmission of H.I.V. and providing treatment for infected children, were eliminated last week, revealing the chaotic nature of the department's restructuring.
While some losses had already been reported, it has now come to light that all staff dedicated to H.I.V. prevention in foreign countries have been either terminated or reassigned within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the State Department, and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
Although maternal health programs remain funded by the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the absence of personnel to manage these initiatives raises concerns about the continuity of services.
A federal health official expressed hope that this situation does not indicate a diminished priority for maternal and child health within PEPFAR, suggesting that it is a mistake that could be rectified.
The implications of these personnel changes are severe, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where a child under 15 dies of AIDS every seven minutes. A study published in The Lancet has projected that suspending PEPFAR could result in approximately one million new H.I.V. infections by 2030, alongside nearly 500,000 AIDS-related deaths among children and the potential orphaning of 2.8 million more.
Initially, the Trump administration's freeze on foreign aid was countered by a waiver permitting the delivery of essential medical services funded by the United States. A specific waiver for PEPFAR later confirmed continued support for programs to prevent mother-to-child transmission of H.I.V. and for the treatment of affected women and children.
However, the resumption of aid has faced delays, with organizations only just beginning to access necessary federal funds to operate their programs.
Experts noted that dismantling the programs occurred swiftly, but rebuilding them with limited staff and institutional knowledge poses significant challenges. The elimination of all pediatric H.I.V. experts from USAID has left only one unit at the CDC capable of advising on overseas programs, which was also affected by last week's reorganization.
This unexpected development surprised both federal health workers and partner organizations, leading to confusion regarding the future of H.I.V. services for mothers and children.
The Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, which relies on the CDC for a substantial portion of its budget, expressed astonishment at the termination of the entire CDC unit focused on H.I.V.
Despite having guaranteed funding until September, issues have arisen regarding payment systems, leaving partners scrambling to navigate financial uncertainties.
Some experts highlighted a lack of consistency in the administration's actions, suggesting that the changes do not align with the needs of vulnerable populations.
Providing care for children and pregnant women with H.I.V. is complex. Infected infants require different testing and treatment protocols than adults, and interruptions in care can lead to rapid deterioration.
In low-income countries, pregnant women typically receive treatment at prenatal clinics, where the risk of H.I.V. transmission to the baby can be significantly reduced with proper care. Since its launch in 2003, PEPFAR has helped prevent nearly eight million such infections.
The earlier foreign aid freeze has led to shortages of pediatric H.I.V. medications and delays in new treatment deliveries, complicating the situation further.
CDC experts who were dismissed had been instrumental in preparing low-income countries for transitions in treatment protocols, ensuring that essential medications reached areas with the greatest need.
Coordination during this period of significant change remains critical, according to health officials familiar with the situation.