**DACA Faces Legal Challenges as Court Weighs Future of Program for Young Immigrants** In a significant legal battle, the future of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program hangs in the balance as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit hears arguments regarding its legality. Established by former President Barack Obama, DACA has provided undocumented immigrants who arrived in the U.S. as children—often referred to as "Dreamers"—with protection from deportation, allowing them to pursue careers and build families without fear. For over a decade, DACA has withstood political turbulence and legal scrutiny, but it now faces a critical moment as Texas and six other Republican-led states challenge its validity. The program, which peaked with around 800,000 enrollees, currently supports approximately 500,000 individuals who have contributed to the economy and society by working in various sectors, including technology and healthcare. The recent hearing involved a three-judge panel discussing a lower court's ruling that deemed DACA illegal and sought to terminate it nationwide. Judge Andrew S. Hanen previously ruled that the Biden administration's efforts to solidify DACA were inadequate and that the program was improperly enacted by Obama. This ruling, currently on hold, could have far-reaching implications if upheld. During the hearing, Judge Stephen A. Higginson questioned the authority of a single judge to impose a nationwide ban on DACA, emphasizing the program's positive impact on many states. He challenged the argument that DACA recipients were a financial burden, pointing out that many have lived in the U.S. for most of their lives and contribute to their communities. Legal representatives for Texas argued that DACA recipients would likely leave the country if the program ended, but experts countered that many are committed to staying and building their lives in the U.S. The case raises critical questions about state standing to challenge federal immigration policy, with recent Supreme Court decisions suggesting limitations on such challenges. As the legal proceedings unfold, supporters of DACA gathered outside the courthouse, advocating for the program's continuation. Among them was Sandra Avalos, a DACA recipient who fears losing her job and being separated from her U.S.-born son if the program is terminated. Despite the uncertainty, she expressed hope following the hearing. The outcome of this case could reshape the lives of countless Dreamers and their families, highlighting the ongoing debate over immigration policy in the United States.