Israel's largest union initiated a strike in an attempt to pressure the government into agreeing to a cease-fire amidst the ongoing conflict with Hamas. However, the strike was short-lived as the union complied with a court order to end it. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered a defiant speech, refusing to compromise in negotiations with Hamas and criticizing the protesters for undermining social cohesion. The strike disrupted various services, but did not garner the same level of public support as previous protests against the government. Netanyahu's right-wing party remained united, with little internal opposition to his stance on the conflict. The protesters demanded a cease-fire and hostage release, while the government and its supporters sought a deal that would allow the military to continue fighting Hamas. The discovery of the bodies of six Israeli hostages, previously thought to be alive, further fueled the protesters' anger and led to emotional funerals. Despite the public outcry, Netanyahu stood firm in his refusal to withdraw from strategic areas of Gaza, a core demand of Hamas. The protests and strike are unlikely to sway Netanyahu, as they are not supported by his right-wing base. In fact, they may even strengthen his position among his supporters, who view the strike as a concession to terrorism. The lack of significant internal opposition within Netanyahu's party further solidifies his stance. Some moderates may have been deterred from joining the protests due to their accusatory tone and concerns about the impact of social unrest on national security. Additionally, the memory of domestic unrest in 2023, which was perceived as weakening Israel, may have influenced some Israelis to avoid supporting the protests. Overall, the article highlights the deep divisions within Israel regarding the approach to the conflict with Hamas, with the government and its supporters advocating for a tough stance, while protesters demand a more conciliatory approach.