Vanderbilt University's chancellor, Daniel Diermeier, addressed new students, making it clear that the university would not divest from Israel, ban provocative speakers, or take sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The university also emphasized that it would not tolerate disruptions to the learning environment. This proactive approach aimed to maintain order following the protests that affected many American campuses in the previous academic year. Amid concerns about potential unrest due to the Israel-Hamas war and the upcoming presidential election, universities across the country are reevaluating their strategies for handling protests. Some have opted for stricter policies, including bans on unapproved encampments and mandatory training on hate speech. This shift comes in response to pressure from court rulings, government orders, and investigations. Vanderbilt, with its 13,000 students, has experienced tensions, including a sit-in resulting in arrests and disputes over student government spending aligned with the boycott of Israel. The university's approach has faced criticism from student activists and civil rights groups, who accuse it of stifling speech and protest. Diermeier emphasized the need to clarify the university's principles of open inquiry and institutional neutrality, particularly to incoming students. While the university's efforts to communicate its policies have been met with some discomfort and questioning, new students have largely welcomed the clarity provided. As universities grapple with potential unrest, they are striving to strike a balance between upholding free speech and maintaining order on campus. The evolving landscape of protest management raises questions about the enforcement and consequences of stricter rules.