The N.C.A.A., historically operating with a business model that treated college athletes as amateurs, faced increasing criticism and lawsuits for exploitation. The recent $2.8 billion settlement in a class-action antitrust lawsuit marks a significant shift, allowing for the first-ever revenue-sharing plan for college athletes. However, concerns remain about fair compensation for women, the impact on smaller conferences, and the potential for new issues to arise. The settlement also raises questions about the power of booster-funded groups. While it represents progress, some view the agreement as deeply flawed. The settlement will provide back pay and establish a framework for future payments, but the specifics of who will be compensated and how much remain unclear. The settlement will be largely subsidized by schools not participating in major football, leading to frustration among conferences bearing the majority of the costs. Overall, the settlement is seen as a necessary step but raises complex issues that need careful consideration.